How meeting-ready is your deck?
Upload your deck. Coreworks scores it out of 100, tells you straight whether it is ready to present, and hands you the three fixes that move the number most.
PowerPoint or PDF, up to 50 MB
Solid bones, real gaps
55-69 · Strong draft
A score, a verdict and the fixes.
No vague notes and no homework. You see exactly where the deck stands and what to do about it, before you walk into the room.
Well structured and well designed, but the numbers do not reconcile across slides. For a fund report, that matters more than how polished it looks.
Scored the way a partner reads a deck.
Eight criteria, weighted the way they actually matter before a client meeting. You see where the deck is strong and where it leaks, at a glance.
The dent on the right is the numbers. Everything else holds its shape.
The Skim Test
Can a reader get your argument from the titles alone?
The So-what Test
Does every slide earn its place in the room?
Built on Minto's Pyramid Principle, Tufte, Knaflic, the MBB action-title convention, and IBCS.
Three things to fix first.
Ranked by how much they hold the number back. Fix the top one and the score moves.
Reconcile the headline revenue figure.
Total unrealized carrying value is stated as $255.0M on slides 2/3 but $305.2M on slides 14/15. Pick one definition and make it the same everywhere.
Fix the impossible and mislabeled data.
Deployed capital ($234.5M) cannot exceed called capital ($234M). The KS-PME baseline is the S&P 500, not the Cambridge median. DPI is a multiple (0.20x), not 20 percent.
Resolve the fund's identity.
The cover says Growth Fund II, but the body says Meridian Ventures Fund III. The name, number and geography disagree.
Score your deck in under two minutes.
Founders pressure-test their decks here before the meeting — one upload, a score out of 100, and the three fixes that move it most.