Upload a company's numbers and contracts. Get a detailed memo with revenue, growth, burn, runway, and the gaps to dig into. All in minutes.
No credit card needed · Make a similar deck in 5 minutes
Drop in the company's numbers
and contracts — no setup required.
Executive Summary — the snapshot
Product & Customers — customer concentration
Market Size & Timing — market framing
Competitive Landscape — who you're up against
Traction Dashboard — is efficiency improving
Growth & Efficiency — path to breakeven
Operating Expenses — where the money goes
Retention & NRR — are customers sticking
Hover each orange chip to see what
that part of the prompt does.
The prompt tells Coreworks who this memo is for, what to lead with, and which gaps to flag. Here's what each part is doing.
Draft an . It's for the — built for scrutiny, not a sales pitch. : $8.1M revenue at 75.2% margin, but $596K burn leaves only . Flag the — no usage data, and . End each section with what to check. Keep the tone neutral.
Each thing it spots
shapes one slide.
Coreworks looks over the combined numbers, contracts, and customer data first. Here's what it flags — and what each flag turns into.
The model assumes 100% retention, but the real customer data runs at 76% — a 24-point gap that expansion was hiding, which Coreworks flags as the key thing to verify.
Creates a closing slide, with a “reconcile the assumed vs actual number” flag i.e. the one assumption most likely to change the decision.
$8.1M revenue and 75.2% margins look strong, but $596K monthly burn leaves only 6.76 months of cash — so Coreworks frames the runway as the deciding tension.
Adds a snapshot, with a “hold final terms until the runway question is settled” note.
Across 8 contracts ($140K–$480K) one is far larger than the rest, so Coreworks flags customer concentration — and notes there's no usage data to offset it.
Creates a customer chart, with an “ask for revenue by customer and top-5 concentration” flag.
Revenue of $532K still trails a $548,600 loss, with sales and R&D eating 90%+ of costs, so Coreworks concludes breakeven is several quarters away.
Becomes the efficiency slide, telling the memo to assume burn continues for 2–3 more quarters.
The order
is the argument.
The prompt told Coreworks to open on the trade-off, then work through the case, and end on the riskiest assumption. Here's why that order works.
The committee needs the main tension — strong revenue and margin against short runway — before anything else.
Customer concentration and market size come next, with the market gap flagged honestly so the memo doesn't overstate it.
Show who you're up against before making the case for what's defensible, so the argument is grounded in real deals.
Traction, breakeven path, and cost structure sit together: is efficiency improving, when does it break even, and where does the money go.
Retention closes the memo because the 100%-vs-76% gap is the thing most likely to change the call.
Real funds, real diligence,
same template.
"It found the retention gap on its own. That's exactly the thing we'd have spent a day chasing — and it was on slide ten before the meeting."
"Every number tied back to the data room. When the partner pushed on runway, I showed the math instead of defending a slide."
"We run dozens of memos a quarter, and they were never consistent. Now every deal lands in the same shape, with the gaps named up front."
— ready when you are —
Use the same prompt, upload the company's numbers and contracts, and get a memo your committee can read.
No credit card needed · Make a similar deck in 5 minutes